¶ Order affirmed, with costs.
¶ The bill of particulars submitted by defendant's counsel was clearly inadequate in many instances and did not comply with a conditional order of preclusion dated June 9, 1982 and extended by order dated August 11, 1982. It was not the duty of Special Term to construct a proper bill (Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co. v Flatow,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.