ERIE MIN. CO. v. COM'R OF REVENUE

Nos. C4-83-193, CX-83-196.

343 N.W.2d 261 (1984)

ERIE MINING COMPANY, Respondent-Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, Petitioner-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied February 29, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Windhorst, Jr., Bruce J. Shnider, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, for respondent-petitioner.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Revenue, St. Paul, for petitioner-respondent.

Laurence J. Klun, Ely, amicus curiae for Range Ass'n of Municipalities and Schools.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


TODD, Justice.

Taconite ore was originally taxed in Minnesota based on annual production. The tax on production is "in lieu" of other taxes, including property taxes that could be imposed on taconite producers. See Minn. Stat. § 298.25 (1982). In 1977 the Minnesota legislature amended Minn.Stat. § 298.24 to compute the "in lieu" tax in one of two ways. The tax is now the greater of the annual taconite production or the average of the last three years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases