1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 99 A.D.2d
  5. 99 A.D.2d 500 (1984)
 

ANDERSEN v. DE RAMON

99 A.D.2d 500 (1984)

Shelly Andersen, Appellant, v. Edward R. De Ramon, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 16, 1984

Order affirmed, with costs.

On the totality of the circumstances recited and in light of the recent legislation that has served to repeal the Barasch-Eaton rule (Barasch v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594; Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 56 N.Y.2d 900; see CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d]; L 1983, ch 318), we conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion in relieving defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases