Judgment affirmed.
Defendant contends that when the County Court accepted his plea of guilty there was a failure to ascertain whether his degree of intoxication may have prevented him from forming the necessary intent to commit the crime of robbery in the first degree. However, defendant did not claim that he was drunk, nor that he did not know what he was doing, nor that he did not perceive the criminal nature of his crime (see People v Brown,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
