IN RE PIERCY

No. 50151-3.

101 Wn.2d 490 (1984)

681 P.2d 223

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of RONALD PIERCY, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 26, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Piercy and Kenneth Agtuca, pro se.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Douglas D. Walsh, Assistant, for respondent.

Mitchell A. Riese on behalf of Institutional Legal Services, amicus curiae for petitioners.


PER CURIAM:

The Court of Appeals, Division Three, certified the following question, raised in these consolidated personal restraint petitions, to this court:

Where a prison inmate has been afforded procedural due process for disciplinary violations, must he be afforded the opportunity to personally appear before the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles pursuant to RCW 9.95.080 when it decides to deny him good time credits because of the disciplinary violations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases