1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 102 Wn.2d
  5. 102 Wn.2d 477 (1984)
 

STATE FARM INSURANCE v. EMERSON

No. 50459-8.

102 Wn.2d 477 (1984)

687 P.2d 1139

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. GOLDA EMERSON, Individually and as Personal Representative, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thorner, Almon, Kennedy & Gano, P.S., by Wade E. Gano, for appellant Emerson.

Howard E. Bundy of Francis, Lopez & Ackerman), for appellant Cain.

Reed, McClure, Moceri & Thonn, P.S., by William Robert Hickman, for respondent.

Bryan P. Harnetiaux and Robert H. Whaley on behalf of Washington Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae for appellants.

UTTER, J.

Appellants Golda Emerson and Glen Cain were insureds in a homeowners policy issued by respondent State Farm which excludes liability coverage for bodily injury to any insured. They appeal from a summary judgment declaring the exclusion relieved the respondent from any duty to defend or pay under the policy for injuries to insureds. The trial court found the policy unambiguous and clear, and not violative of public policy. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases