SCHNURRER v. HOERNER-WALDORF

Nos. C0-83-563, C2-83-564.

345 N.W.2d 230 (1984)

Reinhard J. SCHNURRER, Respondent (C0-83-563), Relator (C2-83-564), v. HOERNER-WALDORF and Ins. Company of North America, Relators (C0-83-563), Respondents (C2-83-564), Hoerner-Waldorf and Liberty Mutual Ins. Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

As Modified March 13, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Fram, St. Paul, for employee-relator.

George R. Benton, Minneapolis, for employer and insurer-respondent.

Curtis C. Gilmore & Cynthia K. Nyman, Minneapolis, for employer and insurer-relators Insurance Co. of North America.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


KELLEY, Justice.

The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) held that the employee had not proved Gillette-type injuries to his knee and back and vacated findings of a compensation judge concerning temporary total and permanent partial disabilities and their apportionment between insurers. We conclude the evidence as a whole does not support this conclusion and, therefore, reverse.

Employee worked as a paper baler for Hoerner-Waldorf beginning in 1947...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases