Judgment affirmed.
Defendant, while acknowledging his prior Federal conviction of possession with intent to distribute diazepam, contends that the crime did not constitute a felony in this State. Moreover, defendant claims that his Federal conviction was obtained in violation of his right to the effective assistance of counsel. It bears noting that the effectiveness of counsel issue was previously considered and rejected by a Federal Magistrate of the United States...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
