1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 9 Ohio
  5. 9 Ohio St. 3d 47 (1984)
 

BARNETT v. BARNETT

No. 82-1801.

9 Ohio St. 3d 47 (1984)

BARNETT, APPELLEE, v. BARNETT, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Scott H. Ray, Jr., for appellee.

Messrs. Jarnicki & Logsdon, Mr. Harold Jarnicki and Mr. Robert G. Logsdon, for appellant.

HOLMES, J.

First, we must define in greater detail the issue presented here — or, more precisely, we must state what is not the specific issue presented. The question is not whether the automatic stay provision of Section 362, Title 11, U.S. Code, would thwart a state court's inherent or statutory contempt power, where the exercise of such power is utilized to uphold the dignity of the court. Where the state court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases