1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 235 Kan.
  5. 235 Kan. 331 (1984)
 

CENTRAL SECURITY MUT. INS. CO. v. DePINTO

No. 55,290

235 Kan. 331 (1984)

681 P.2d 15

CENTRAL SECURITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. VICTORIA DePINTO and CINDY DIRKSEN, Appellees, and HESSTON COLLEGE, Intervenor/Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed April 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Roth, of Hershberger, Patterson, Jones & Roth, of Wichita, argued the cause and H.E. Jones, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for the appellant.

Thomas E. Hammond, of Render & Kamas, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Roger M. Theis, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for appellee Cindy Dirksen.

David C. Burns, of Speir, Stroberg & Sizemore, of Newton, argued the cause, and Robert D. Myers, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for intervenor/appellee Hesston College.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LOCKETT, J.:

This is a declaratory judgment action. Central Security Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the district court's determination that exclusionary language contained within its automobile liability policy was not applicable to an automobile accident in which Victoria DePinto was driving a van belonging to Hesston College. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases