STATE v. SATERNUS

No. 84-768-CR.

122 Wis.2d 439 (1984)

361 N.W.2d 728

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Wade A. SATERNUS, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Donna L. Hintze, assistant state public defender, of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Christopher G. Wren, assistant attorney general.

Before Cane, P.J., Dean and Brown, JJ.


CANE, P.J.

Wade Saternus appeals from a judgment convicting him of delivering marijuana in violation of secs. 161.41 (1) (b) and 161.14 (4) (t), Stats., and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that a reasonable juror could have misinterpreted the pattern jury instruction on entrapment, Wis JI—Criminal 780 (1971), to the detriment of his right to due process of law. Because the instruction correctly states Wisconsin law on the allocation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases