1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 452 (1984)
 

MURNICK v. ASBURY PARK

95 N.J. 452 (1984)

471 A.2d 1196

THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl G. Weisenfeld argued the cause for appellants (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, attorneys; Carl G. Weisenfeld, Todd M. Sahner and Paul H. Brownstein, of counsel and on the briefs).

Edward G. Rosenblum argued the cause for respondent (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys).

Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

At issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 54:1-35a and N.J.S.A. 54:2-40.4 (commonly known as "chapter 123") under art. VIII, § 1, para. 1(a) of the New Jersey Constitution, which mandates that real property be assessed according to a uniform standard of value. Resolution of that issue involves determining whether chapter 123 provides the exclusive form of relief from a claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases