ARNOLD, Judge.
The defendants first contend that the trial court erred in allowing the State to cross-examine the defendants' character witness as to knowledge of the defendants' prior similar acts and in denying the defendants' motion for mistrial based on the cross-examination. It is well-established in North Carolina that a character witness may not be asked whether he has heard of particular acts of misconduct by the defendant. See State v. Hunt,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.