CANTWELL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY


506 Pa. 35 (1984)

483 A.2d 1350

Craig CANTWELL, Appellee, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. WILKINSBURG BOROUGH, a municipal corporation, Appellant, and Swissvale Borough, a municipal corporation and Ronald E. Lees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 20, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. McLean, County Sol., Allan J. Opsitnick, Asst. County Sol., Pittsburgh, for Allegheny County.

Herbert Conner, Lawrence Stengel, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Pittsburgh, for Wilkinsburg Borough.

Paul D. Boas, Pittsburgh, for Craig Cantwell.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue in this negligence case concerns the scope of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A (1965). More specifically, we must decide whether county crime labs, which undertake to perform scientific tests at the request of the police, should recognize that the results of those tests are necessary for the protection of criminal suspects who may be affected by them, such that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases