CHRETIAN v. DONALD L. BREN CO.

Docket No. 28402.

151 Cal.App.3d 385 (1984)

198 Cal. Rptr. 523

LEONARD CHRETIAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONALD L. BREN COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Haskins, Nugent, Newnham, Kane & Zvetina and Raymond F. Zvetina for Defendant and Appellant.

Marsh & Graves and Edward E. Marsh, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

WIENER, J.

The sole question is whether the trial court ruled correctly in deciding a provision for compensation in the employment agreement between defendant Donald L. Bren Company (Bren), a real estate developer, and its salesperson plaintiff Leonard Chretian was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. As we shall explain, we conclude the provision is not adhesive, oppressive or substantively unreasonable and not unconscionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases