The defendant tenant's changes on the subscription agreement to refer to the earlier lease of April 23, 1980 were not merely stylistic or for clarification of what the parties were both agreeing to. On the contrary, they were intended as substantive changes to at least lay the groundwork for an argument that the tenant would not have to bear its share for debt service on the underlying mortgage, and perhaps preserve all its rights under the previous lease. As such, the changes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
