HARNICK v. HARNICK

No. 83-1340.

444 So.2d 87 (1984)

Carl HARNICK, Appellant, v. Ethel HARNICK, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith, Mack, Lewis & Allison and R. Hugh Lumpkin, Miami, for appellant.

Burnett Roth, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases