GARY M. GLAZEWSKI et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Opinion filed June 29, 1984.
Rehearing denied August 6, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Leo M. Bleiman, of Leo M. Bleiman, P.C., Donald A. LeBoyer, and David A. Novoselsky, all of Chicago, for appellants.
Harry A. Young, Jr., of Bilandic, Neistein, Richman, Hauslinger & Young, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee Comet Casualty Company.
Alvin R. Becker, of Beermann, Swerdlove, Woloshin, Barezky & Berkson, of Chicago, for appellees Coronet Insurance Company and Allied American Insurance Company.
Eric A. Oesterle, of Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal, of Chicago, for appellees Allstate Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.
Jerome J. Jacobson, of Garbutt & Jacobson, Associated, of Chicago, for appellee Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company.
Walter C. Greenough, of Schiff, Hardin & Waite, of Chicago, for appellees Prestige Casualty Company and American Ambassador Casualty Company.
Marvin D. Berman, of Kiesler & Berman, of Chicago, for appellee Royal Insurance Company.
Gerald M. Rotheiser, of Stern, Rotheiser & Dupree, of Chicago, for appellee Merit Insurance Company.
Robert Parrillo, of Parrillo, Weiss & Moss, of Chicago, for appellee Safeway Insurance Company.
Seymour J. Gaynes, of Udoni, Connelly & Gaynes, of Chicago, for appellee Heritage Insurance Group.
Denis R. Pollina, of Pollina & Phelan, of Northbrook, for appellee American Ambassador Casualty Company.
Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).
Affirmed in part, and reversed in part and remanded.
JUSTICE McGLOON delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their class action complaint filed on behalf of all those who purchased underinsured motorist coverage in the minimum limits of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per occurrence against various insurance companies which issued the endorsements. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that (1) the complaint stated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
