1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 312 S.E.2d
  5. 312 S.E.2d 212 (1984)
 

STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 8318SC792.

312 S.E.2d 212 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Sherman Arthur THOMPSON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Wilson Hayman, Raleigh, for the State.

Graham, Cooke, Miles & Bogan by Donald T. Bogan, Greensboro, for defendant, appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether the court erred "in its findings of aggravating and mitigating factors" and in sentencing defendant to prison terms exceeding the presumptive terms.

Under N.C.Gen.Stat. Sec. 15A-1340.4(b), a trial judge who imposes a prison term in excess of the presumptive must ground his decision on specifically identified aggravating factors "proved by a preponderance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases