AGET v. STATE

No. 83-1629.

448 So.2d 67 (1984)

Angel AGET, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Renee E. Ruska, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


BASKIN, Judge.

Angel Aget, appealing his conviction for the sale of diazepan, cites as prejudicial error the trial court's instruction charging the jury, over defense objection, to consider the testimony of an accomplice with great caution. Finding merit in appellant's assertion, we reverse.

In Dudley v. State, 405 So.2d 304, 305, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the court stated

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases