1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 357 N.W.2d
  5. 357 N.W.2d 156 (1984)
 

D & A DEVELOPMENT CO. v. BUTLER

No. C0-83-1504.

357 N.W.2d 156 (1984)

D & A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Walter BUTLER, Gerald Carlson, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Black, Joseph L. Dunn, Stacker & Ravich, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Larry B. Guthrie, Maun, Green, Hayes, Simon, Johannesson & Brehl, St. Paul, for respondent.

David S. Doty, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and HUSPENI and FORSBERG, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

D & A Development Company (D & A) appeals from a summary judgment that dismissed its malpractice action against Butler and Carlson for failure to state a cause of action. D & A contends on appeal that Butler and Carlson are liable in negligence for failing to complete architectural plans on time. We affirm.

FACTS

D & A employed Walter Butler Company (WBC), a professional corporation, to design and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases