1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 346 N.W.2d
  5. 346 N.W.2d 162 (1984)
 

OT IND. v. OT-TEHDAS OY

Nos. C2-83-1729, C4-83-1795.

346 N.W.2d 162 (1984)

OT INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant (C2-83-1729), Respondent (C4-83-1795), v. OT-TEHDAS OY SANTASALO-SOHLBERG AB, et al., Respondents (C2-83-1729), Appellants (C4-83-1795), Larry M. Lawson, Respondent (C4-83-1795).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Minneapolis, for appellant in C2-83-1729.

Leon R. Bissonette, Larson & Lambert, Wayzata, for appellant in C4-83-1795.

Langlais, Smith, Mooney, Gilbert & Latimore, St. Paul, for respondent Lawson.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and WOZNIAK and LANSING, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

OT Industries, Inc. (OTI) appeals from an order denying its request for a temporary injunction, and OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg Ab (OT-tehdas) appeals from the denial of its motion for a change of venue and motion to dismiss.

OTI contends that the distributorship agreement between OTI and OT-tehdas is governed by the Minnesota Franchise Act and that OT-tehdas' termination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases