1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 462 So.2d
  5. 462 So.2d 28 (1984)
 

KANDEL v. COMEAU BUILDING, INC.

No. 84-116.

462 So.2d 28 (1984)

Bernard KANDEL and Jacqueline E. Kandel, Appellants, v. COMEAU BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing and Clarification Denied February 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Powell of Powell, Tennyson & St. John, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Moira K. Lasch of Baskin & Steingut, and Richard L. Martens of Boose, Ciklin & Martens, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the defendants, Bernard Kandel and Jacqueline E. Kandel, even though denominated as sublessees, were given an option to renew the lease in question by the lessor, which renewal option was reflected by Addendum No. 2 dated November 12, 1980. Moreover, it clearly appears that the Kandels validly exercised their option and are entitled to its benefits.

The judgment on appeal is

REVERSED.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases