STATE v. STROGER


97 N.J. 391 (1984)

478 A.2d 1175

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD STROGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Apicella, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).

Carol M. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

William R. Wood argued the cause for amicus curiae, Division of Ethics and Professional Services (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Assistant Director, attorney).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

Defendant, Howard Stroger, is a member of the bar of this state. Following the Law Division's denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence, 185 N.J.Super. 124 (1981), defendant pleaded guilty to embezzlement. With the consent of the State and approval of the trial court, the plea was conditioned on defendant's right to appeal the denial of his motion. The appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases