1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 99 A.D.2d
  5. 99 A.D.2d 382 (1984)
 

MTR HENRY v. BOYD

99 A.D.2d 382 (1984)

In the Matter of George Henry et al., Appellants, v. Ruth A. H. Boyd et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 6, 1984

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oak Orchard Legal Services, Inc. (Dana Ragsdale of counsel), for appellants.

David Baird (Thomas Parmele of counsel), for respondents.

O'DONNELL and MOULE, JJ., concur with SCHNEPP, J.; HANCOCK, JR., J. P., and DOERR, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order in an opinion by HANCOCK, JR., J. P.

SCHNEPP, J.

The question on this appeal is whether the legal responsibility of petitioners under section 415 of the Family Court Act to support their 17-year-old daughter on public assistance terminates by reason of her marriage (Social Services Law, § 101, subd 1; see, also, Domestic Relations Law, § 32, subd 3; Family Ct Act, § 413). Section 415 of the Family Court Act, where relevant here, provides that the parent of a child under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases