STATE v. ARROYO

No. 83-2274.

454 So.2d 21 (1984)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Augustine Lasaro ARROYO, Morgan Raudolph Tynes, Marcos Alfredo Arce and Miguel Sagre, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied August 30, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Geoffrey C. Fleck; Fine, Jacobson, Block, Klein, Colan & Simon and Theodore Klein, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

In an earlier appearance of this case, we reversed an order granting the defendants' motion to suppress on the ground that the trial judge, then Judge Tendrich, had impermissibly taken into account evidence of an experiment which we found inadmissible because of the defendants' failure to establish a substantial similarity between the conditions of the experiment and the conditions surrounding the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases