SIBBERT v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. C7-84-571.

354 N.W.2d 106 (1984)

Roger SIBBERT, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane C. Hanson, Schwebel, Goetz, Sieben & Hanson, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Thomas E. Peterson, Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Sullivan & Cole, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Sibbert was injured in a two-car accident while driving his Camaro. He also owns a Duster. He maintained a separate underinsurance policy on each car with State Farm. He recovered the other driver's $25,000 liability limits. Although State Farm did pay the no-fault and underinsurance benefits on the Camaro, it refuses to pay the underinsurance coverage on the Duster, pursuant to an exclusionary clause in the policy barring claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases