PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
OTT, C.J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Appellant incorrectly suggests in his motion for rehearing that this court held that a will could not be set aside on the basis of a nonbeneficiary's exercise of undue influence. Rather, the rationale for our affirmance was based on a determination that appellant's bare allegations of undue influence by a nonbeneficiary were insufficient...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
