1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 156 Cal.App.3d
  5. 156 Cal.App.3d 302 (1984)
 

STONEHAM v. RUSHEN

Docket Nos. A021730, A023754.

156 Cal.App.3d 302 (1984)

203 Cal. Rptr. 20

ELVRY STONEHAM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. RUTH RUSHEN, as Director, etc., Defendant and Appellant. GEORGE DENTON, as Director, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY, Respondent; ELVRY STONEHAM et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

May 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Karl S. Mayer and Thomas P. Dove, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent Court.

Michael Satris, Donald Specter and Charles S. Bishop for Plaintiffs and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.†]

OPINION

RACANELLI, P.J.

In these consolidated proceedings, we consider certain questions left undecided in Stoneham v. Rushen (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 729, 734, 737 [188 Cal.Rptr. 130] [Stoneham...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases