1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 236 Kan.
  5. 236 Kan. 218 (1984)
 

ROE v. DIEFENDORF

No. 56,352

236 Kan. 218 (1984)

689 P.2d 855

MICHAEL J. ROE, Appellee, v. LAURA DIEFENDORF, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed October 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Stites, of Stites, Hill & Wilson, of Manhattan, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

Jeffrey Ray Elder, of Myers & Pottroff, of Manhattan, argued the cause and Robert L. Pottroff, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HERD, J.:

This is a civil action by Michael J. Roe seeking recovery from Laura Diefendorf for bodily injuries from her negligence in an automobile accident.

As a preliminary matter Roe argues there are two reasons Diefendorf's statement of facts in her brief should not be accepted by the court. First, it is claimed there is improper citation to the record. Diefendorf does not identify the record as recommended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases