AUER v. BIENSTOCK


104 A.D.2d 350 (1984)

Kenneth Auer et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Herbert Bienstock et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. A.M.F. Incorporated, Respondent; Harley Davidson of New York City, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. City of New York et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 6, 1984


Interlocutory judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

During the trial of this action, which arose out of a two-vehicle accident, reversible error occurred when the court, over objection by plaintiffs' counsel, admitted a police report concerning the accident into evidence. The report contained statements of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases