IN RE CRISEL

No. 59134.

101 Ill.2d 332 (1984)

461 N.E.2d 994

In re J. EARL CRISEL, Attorney, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed March 23, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Drake, of Springfield, for the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

John L. Swartz, of Giffin, Winning, Lindner, Newkirk, Cohen & Bodewes, P.C., of Springfield, for respondent.


Suspension ordered but stayed; conditional probation entered.

JUSTICE MORAN delivered the opinion of the court:

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a complaint charging respondent, J. Earl Crisel, with conduct tending to bring the courts and the legal profession into disrepute. The charge was based on respondent's involvement in a series of acts occurring between May and October of 1980. The Hearing Board found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases