FINN v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 34292.

156 Cal.App.3d 268 (1984)

202 Cal. Rptr. 732

NORMAN FINN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 23, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Gregory W. Jones for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, Michael R. Capizzi, Assistant District Attorney, William W. Bedsworth and Steven B. Bickel, Deputy District Attorneys, John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Herschel T. Elkins, Assistant Attorney General, M. Howard Wayne and Michael R. Botwin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

CROSBY, J.

This writ proceeding to test the superior court's refusal to dismiss an information presents a classic illustration of the legal axiom that a specific statute prevails over a general one, the so called "Swann-Gilbert" or "Williamson" rule in the law of crimes of California.

I

Norman Finn is a mobilehome dealer. Phyllis Wingett listed her furnished mobilehome at the Salton Sea with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases