STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR MARICOPA

No. 17649-SA.

142 Ariz. 280 (1984)

689 P.2d 539

The STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Thomas E. COLLINS, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA; The Honorable Morris Rozar, Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Respondents, and and Michael Frederick FLIEGEL, Real Party in Interest, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

October 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Collins, Maricopa County Atty. by Joel M. Glynn, Sandra Janzen, Deputy County Attys., Phoenix, for petitioner.

Ross P. Lee, Maricopa County Public Defender by Paul C. Klapper, James L.P. Logan, Deputy Public Defenders, Phoenix, for respondents.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by William J. Schafer, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for brief amicus curiae, State of Ariz.

Stephen G. Udall, Apache County Atty., St. Johns, Dale Patton, Navajo County Atty., Holbrook, John Verkamp, Coconino County Atty., Flagstaff, William J. Ekstrom, Mohave County Atty., Kingman, Jack Williams, Graham County Atty., Safford, William A. Coffeen, Greenlee County Atty., Clifton, Don Moon, La Paz County Atty., Parker, Roy Mendoza, Pinal County Atty., Florence, Charles Hastings, Yavapai County Atty., Prescott, Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty., Tucson, Beverly Jenney, Cochise County Atty., Bisbee, Dennis T. Fenwick, Santa Cruz County Atty., Nogales; Robert Duber II, Gila County Atty. by Candyce C. Beumler, Deputy County Atty., Globe, David Ellsworth, Yuma County Atty. by Timothy Holtzen, Deputy County Atty., Yuma, for brief amicus curiae, The County Attys. of The Fourteen Counties Outside Maricopa County.


CAMERON, Justice.

This is a special action arising from the granting of defendant's motion to strike the state's allegation of prior convictions pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604. We have jurisdiction under Article 6, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution.

The state's petition raises only one question: May enhancement of punishment pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604(A) be based on separate offenses, committed on separate occasions, but charged in the same indictment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases