1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 318 S.E.2d
  5. 318 S.E.2d 102 (1984)
 

MILLER v. KITE

No. 8328DC497.

318 S.E.2d 102 (1984)

Barbara (Kite) MILLER v. Dennis Sherman KITE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riddle, Shackelford & Hyler by George B. Hyler, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Pitts, Hugenschmidt, Krause & Davis by Sara H. Davis, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant's contention that he has not been properly served with process requires no discussion. The record shows that he was properly served three times. Thus, we proceed to the main question presented by the defendant's appeal—whether the District Court of Buncombe County has in personam jurisdiction over him. The first step in the two step process required in matters of this kind, Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases