HERRERA v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B004042.

158 Cal.App.3d 255 (1984)

204 Cal. Rptr. 553

CONSUELO HERRERA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; SCHILLER W. LISNEK et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 12, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Erwin Sobel and David P. Koppelman for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Sam Schermer and John D. Mickus for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

WOODS, P.J.

By petition for writ of mandate plaintiff Consuelo Herrera seeks vacation of an order by respondent superior court which denied her motion for leave to amend her complaint and granted the motion to compel arbitration of defendants/real parties in interest Schiller W. Lisnek and S.W. Lisnek, D.P.M., Inc.

Plaintiff contends that (1) there was no legal basis for denying leave to amend her complaint for medical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases