DRIVERS, ETC., LOCAL NO. 695 v. WERC

No. 83-2332.

121 Wis.2d 291 (1984)

359 N.W.2d 174

DRIVERS, SALESMEN, WAREHOUSEMEN, MILK PROCESSORS, CANNERY, DAIRY EMPLOYEES & HELPERS LOCAL NO. 695, Petitioner-Respondent, v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 26, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David C.Rice, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by David C. Rice, assistant attorney general.

For interested party, City of Greenfield, there was oral argument by Michael P. Wherry and Mulcahy & Wherry, of Milwaukee.

For the petitioner-respondent there was a brief by Marianne Goldstein Robbins and Goldberg, Previant, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman, S.C., of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Marianne Goldstein Robbins.

Before Bablitch, J., Dykman, J. and Bruce F. Beilfuss, Reserve Judge.


DYKMAN, J.

The Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission appeals from a judgment of the circuit court reversing WERC's declaratory ruling that the city of Greenfield has no duty to bargain collectively1 with Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees and Helpers Local No. 695 on layoff and recall2 provisions of a labor agreement. Giving due weight to WERC's interpretation that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases