Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 6, 1955. In this proceeding to discipline the respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the special referee's report. The respondent submits a statement in opposition to petitioner's motion asking that the petition containing the charges be dismissed.
The special referee found respondent guilty of three charges of professional misconduct as follows...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.