1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 14 Ohio
  5. 14 Ohio St. 3d 26 (1984)
 

STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN, v. GRIFFIN

No. 84-359.

14 Ohio St. 3d 26 (1984)

THE STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN, PROS. ATTY., APPELLANT, v. GRIFFIN, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. George J. Sadd and Mr. William Vance, for appellant.

Gold, Rotatori, Schwartz & Gibbons Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Niki Z. Schwartz, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

"* * * It is well-settled that in order for prohibition to lie, three requirements must be satisfied: `(1) the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law; and (3) it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists.' Ohio Bell v. Ferguson (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 74, 76...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases