1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 280 S.C.
  5. 280 S.C. 107 (1984)
 

EM-CO METAL PROD. v. GREAT A. & P. TEA CO.

0036

280 S.C. 107 (1984)

311 S.E.2d 83

EM-CO METAL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., The Haskell Co. and M & C Steel, Inc., Defendants, of whom The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and The Haskell Co. are Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

January 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alford, Johnson & Salane, and Barnes & Austin, Columbia, for appellant.

McNair, Glenn, Konduros, Corley, Singletary, Porter & Dibble, Columbia, for respondents.

January 3, 1984.

GOOLSBY, Judge:

The sole question for our consideration in this action to foreclose a mechanic's lien is whether there was an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law on the part of the lower court in relieving the respondents Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A & P), and Haskell Company from default judgment and allowing them to answer. The appellant Em-Co Metal Products...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases