STATE v. BROTEN

No. C1-83-1057.

343 N.W.2d 38 (1984)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Gordon Melvin Gale BROTEN, Jr., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce H. Hanley, Hanley, Hergott & Hunziker, Minneapolis, Douglas Peine, St. Paul, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Gerald Anderson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal in which the defendant contends that the trial court erred in computing defendant's criminal history score and in departing durationally from the presumptive sentence. We affirm this sentence.

Recently, in State v. Broten, 341 N.W.2d 279 (Minn.1983), we affirmed defendant's conviction of the 1980 burglary of a Roseau store. This appeal concerns defendant's sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases