1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 103 Wn.2d
  5. 103 Wn.2d 268 (1984)
 

CHANDLER v. OTTO

Nos. 50885-2, 50886-1, 50887-9, 50888-7.

103 Wn.2d 268 (1984)

693 P.2d 71

DAVID CHANDLER, ET AL, Appellants, v. LOTTIE OTTO, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ries & Kenison, by Harry E. Ries, for appellants.

Collins & Hansen, by Nels A. Hansen, for respondent.

PEARSON, J.

This case involves a recall petition filed against members of the Moses Lake City Council. The issue presented is whether the charges propounded in the petition allege sufficient grounds for recall. The trial court, pursuant to RCW 29.82.010, as amended by Laws of 1984, ch. 170, conducted a hearing to determine the sufficiency of the charges and adequacy of the ballot synopsis and concluded that the charges were sufficient. We hold that the recall charges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases