HAPONSKI v. CONSTRUCTOR'S INC.

No. 8410IC49.

323 S.E.2d 46 (1984)

Edward L. HAPONSKI v. CONSTRUCTOR'S INC., and Iowa National Mutual Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blanchard, Tucker, Twiggs, Earls & Abrams by Douglas B. Abrams, Raleigh, for claimant-appellant.

Russ, Worth, Cheatwood & McFadyen by Walker Y. Worth, Jr., Fayetteville, for defendants-appellees.


ARNOLD, Judge.

Claimant contends that in light of testimony by claimant's doctors that he should see a psychiatrist or psychologist or consult with the Duke Pain Clinic, the Full Commission erred in finding that defendant had reached maximum medical improvement.

In assessing claimant's contention, the scope of our review is to determine whether competent evidence was before the Commission to support its findings of fact and whether, in turn, its findings justify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases