1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 273 (1984)
 

IN RE LABENDZ

95 N.J. 273 (1984)

471 A.2d 21

IN THE MATTER OF RALPH W. LABENDZ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Counsel, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Henry N. Luther, III, argued the cause for respondent (Dillon, Bitar & Luther, attorneys; Mary A. Powers, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arose as a result of a presentment filed by the District XII Ethics Committee (Committee) against respondent, a member of the bar. It concerns his alleged participation in an attempt to perpetrate a fraud upon a federally insured savings and loan association to obtain a mortgage for a client. After a hearing, the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) concluded that respondent's conduct violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases