1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 102 A.D.2d
  5. 102 A.D.2d 266 (1984)
 

COUNTY OF BROOME v. CUOMO

102 A.D.2d 266 (1984)

In the Matter of County of Broome et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Mario M. Cuomo, as Governor of The State of New York, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 21, 1984

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Lew A. Millenbach and William J. Kogan of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Hancock & Estabrook (David E. Peebles of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

MAIN, J. P., MIKOLL, YESAWICH, JR., and HARVEY, JJ., concur.

CASEY, J.

The central issue on this appeal is whether the State is compelled, pursuant to section 10 of the State Law, to provide counsel for petitioners' defense in certain actions commenced against them in Federal District Court by various Indian tribes claiming title and possessory rights with respect to certain real property. We agree with Special Term that section 10 of the State Law is applicable to two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases