1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 102 Wn.2d
  5. 102 Wn.2d 260 (1984)
 

POWER v. WASHINGTON WATER POWER CO.

No. 48413-9.

102 Wn.2d 260 (1984)

684 P.2d 716

POWER, Appellant, v. THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Bamberger, for appellant.

Paine, Hamblen, Coffin & Brooke, by David J. Meyer, for respondent.

Paul G. Cornelius and Kenneth E. Reeves on behalf of National Consumer Law Center, amici curiae for appellant.

DOLLIVER, J.

Upon reconsideration of Power v. Washington Water Power Co., 99 Wn.2d 289, 662 P.2d 374 (1983), we affirm with the following modifications.

The majority in Power erroneously determined that POWER did not employ expert witnesses or technical consultants. POWER in fact did hire several experts. Although these witnesses did not testify, they were used to assist in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases