RUSHFORD v. ZONING B. of A. of PITTSBURGH

No. 397 C.D. 1982.

81 Pa.Commw. 274 (1984)

Anthony Rushford et al. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Pittsburgh et al. Gregory J. Winokur and Amy G. Winokur, his wife, and A. G. Associates, Appellants.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

April 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Silvestri, for appellants.

James G. Dunn, Wymard & Dunn, for appellees.

Argued October 6, 1983, before Judges WILLIAMS, JR., BARRY and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE BARRY, April 2, 1984:

This appeal arises from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, reversing an order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Pittsburgh (Board) which granted a variance to the appellants, Gregory J. Winokur and Amy G. Winokur, his wife.

The appellants sought a rear yard variance of twenty-one feet from the Board in order to put an addition containing an indoor swimming pool to the rear of an existing single...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases