SAGE v. BERNARDS TP.


6 N.J. Tax 349 (1984)

WILLIS F. SAGE, MERWIN SAGE AND WILLIAM W. LANIGAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. THEODORE Z. LORENC AND EDMOND LORENC, TRUSTEES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William W. Lanigan argued the cause for appellants (Lanigan, O'Connell & Chazin, attorneys; William W. Lanigan, of counsel and on the brief and Carl H. Rifino, on the brief).

Louis P. Rago argued the cause for respondent (Farrell, Curtis, Carlin & Davidson, attorneys; Louis P. Ragon, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, KING and DREIER.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in this consolidated action appeal from the decisions of Judge Lario in the Tax Court, 5 N.J.Tax 39 and 52 confirming their reassessments for the 1980 tax year of property located in the newly established Planned Residential Neighborhood (PRN) zone. Plaintiffs are Willis F. Sage, Merwin Sage and William W. Lanigan (Sage) and Theodore Z. Lorenc and Edmond Lorenc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases