1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 101 Wn.2d
  5. 101 Wn.2d 252 (1984)
 

ALPINE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. GOHL

No. 49780-0.

101 Wn.2d 252 (1984)

676 P.2d 488

ALPINE INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL, Respondents, v. MYRON C. GOHL, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 16, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielsen, Nielsen & Leach, Inc., P.S., by Drew Nielsen, for petitioners.

Trethewey, Brink, Todd & Clayton, by Winship A. Todd, Jr., for respondents.

PEARSON, J.

This case presents several issues requiring interpretation of the rules governing trial and appellate procedure. The first issue raised is whether a trial court's ruling on a CR 59(j) application for leave to file a new trial motion is an appealable order under RAP 2.2. We hold that, under the circumstances presented here, such a ruling constitutes a final order after judgment appealable pursuant to RAP 2.2(a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases