1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 253 (1984)
 

IN RE HOLLIS

95 N.J. 253 (1984)

471 A.2d 10

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. HOLLIS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Counsel, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

John P. Libretti and Nino D. Cariddi, argued the cause for respondent (Libretti and Weston, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter was originally before us on January 12, 1982, the return day of an order to show cause why the respondent, a member of the bar of this State, should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined because of his allegedly inappropriate conduct involving five different matters. We were satisfied upon our review at that time that a substantial suspension period was warranted. (The Disciplinary Review Board had recommended a two-year suspension...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases